Move your old Access system to VB.NET
Microsoft Access is really getting out of date
Microsoft will keep supporting VBA for a long time to come, yet the programming accentuation has changed irreversibly for Visual Basic.Net.
For organization frameworks, the mix of a Visual Basic Front-End with an Access database Back-End is the perfect. Visual Basic is business rules arranged – and an Access database is shoddy, productive and simple to keep up.
Visual Basic.Net Upgrade Conversion Reasons
The explanations behind an overhaul from a Microsoft Access Front-End database to a Visual Basic.Net Front-End are:
A key corporate choice
The trouble in supporting Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) later on
The trouble and cost in keeping up out of date and mistake ridden code – and most Access code contain a large number of issues
The trouble and cost in supporting schedules composed by novices without respect to coding gauges
The need to supplant wasteful organization frameworks that just "developed like Topsy"
The need to supplant cumbersome Access Forms with a more proficient option
The many idiosyncrasies of Access bound structures
The execution issues and consistent tuning required
The high Network activity
The set number of concurrent clients
The trouble in changing over from the MDB to ACCDB arrange databases
Thus, the change of the current Microsoft Access Front-End and Forms to Visual Basic is typically a goal.
Most new organization applications will these days be outlined by the expert designer utilizing a VB.Net Front-End. A quick'n'dirty Access Front-End may in any case be utilized for erratic testing or prototyping.
Microsoft Access To VB.Net: Suggested Conversion Strategy
It is practically difficult to consequently change over a Microsoft Access Form with its joined VBA code to a current Visual Basic.Net Form. It is a great deal more pragmatic to endeavor to remove just the current business rules rationale, and begin sans preparation making new VB.Net Front-End Forms.
This note subtle elements the procedures expected to limit a portion of the obstacles that will be met with the change procedure, and lessen the programming exertion.
Distinguish The Business Rules In The VBA Code
The vast majority of the VBA code rationale in Forms is utilized as a part of support of the User Interface – it has no significance in a cutting edge VB.Net condition. There will be little to be picked up from any endeavor to change over the Form related code.
The VBA to VB.Net change exertion ought to focus on the recognizable proof and transformation of business guidelines contained in VBA code modules and the Form's VBA code.
A Summary Of Conversion Effort Required
These are the issues confronting the engineer:
Extend – There is the choice of utilizing a MDI Form or a Multi-Tabbed Form
Menu – A TreeView control would plentifully supplant the old Switchboard or Menu Form
Shapes – The current Forms should be totally revised
Modules – Business rationale code ought to be separated
Reports – The current Microsoft Access reports can at present be utilized
Tables – The current Back-End Microsoft Access Tables can in any case be utilized
Actualizing Visual Basic.Net Standards
The change exertion particularly relies on the coding models utilized by the past Microsoft Access software engineers. Ordinarily, contingent on the experience of the developers and the age when the framework was first made – the benchmarks will leave a considerable measure to be wanted.
Module coding guidelines that will facilitate the change ought to be changed over first. There are a few adjustments that should be possible at first to make the later code transformation simpler:
Reliable space
Announce all Variables with a Type
Utilize a prefix of say "m_" or "g_" for Module or Global factors
Guarantee that Global factors announced are for sure required internationally
Set Option Explicit in each code Module
Add an information Type to all Variables, regardless of whether dimensioned or a parameter
Add an arrival information sort to all Functions
Utilize capacities like DateAdd for date number-crunching, rather than "+" or '- "
Dispense with all Eval capacities
Dispense with all "blast" develops – i.e. Forms!Customers!CustomerID
It would be useful if Control fields could be renamed with expressive names, rather than Text1, Text2 or Command1, Command2. Sadly changing a Field name can cause issues, as the Field might be alluded to in different Forms, Macros, Reports, Modules or Queries. After any such changes, the Access framework normally turns into a bad dream to troubleshoot.
Lastly, utilize an Access code analyser to distinguish significant issue zones.
Changing over DAO To ADO
DAO capacities like Recordsets and Querydefs should be changed over to either ADO or ADO.Net. ADO.Net has supplanted ADO, yet ADO is as yet bolstered. On the off chance that you know about ADO, stay with it – it is less complex than and similarly as productive as ADO.Net.
After The Initial Conversion To Visual Basic.Net
Keeping in mind the end goal to get the new VB.Net framework working effectively and wiping out code notices, the accompanying issues should be gone to:
All factors in Functions or Subroutines will, naturally, be proclaimed with a ByVal watchword. Wherever an esteem should be restored, the watchword ought to be changed to ByRef.
Discretionary parameters in Function and Sub schedules must have a default esteem.
Constants will require an unequivocal information sort.
Utilize Option Strict to guarantee productivity and maintain a strategic distance from information Type blunders.
Microsoft will keep supporting VBA for a long time to come, yet the programming accentuation has changed irreversibly for Visual Basic.Net.
For organization frameworks, the mix of a Visual Basic Front-End with an Access database Back-End is the perfect. Visual Basic is business rules arranged – and an Access database is shoddy, productive and simple to keep up.
Visual Basic.Net Upgrade Conversion Reasons
The explanations behind an overhaul from a Microsoft Access Front-End database to a Visual Basic.Net Front-End are:
A key corporate choice
The trouble in supporting Visual Basic for Applications (VBA) later on
The trouble and cost in keeping up out of date and mistake ridden code – and most Access code contain a large number of issues
The trouble and cost in supporting schedules composed by novices without respect to coding gauges
The need to supplant wasteful organization frameworks that just "developed like Topsy"
The need to supplant cumbersome Access Forms with a more proficient option
The many idiosyncrasies of Access bound structures
The execution issues and consistent tuning required
The high Network activity
The set number of concurrent clients
The trouble in changing over from the MDB to ACCDB arrange databases
Thus, the change of the current Microsoft Access Front-End and Forms to Visual Basic is typically a goal.
Most new organization applications will these days be outlined by the expert designer utilizing a VB.Net Front-End. A quick'n'dirty Access Front-End may in any case be utilized for erratic testing or prototyping.
Microsoft Access To VB.Net: Suggested Conversion Strategy
It is practically difficult to consequently change over a Microsoft Access Form with its joined VBA code to a current Visual Basic.Net Form. It is a great deal more pragmatic to endeavor to remove just the current business rules rationale, and begin sans preparation making new VB.Net Front-End Forms.
This note subtle elements the procedures expected to limit a portion of the obstacles that will be met with the change procedure, and lessen the programming exertion.
Distinguish The Business Rules In The VBA Code
The vast majority of the VBA code rationale in Forms is utilized as a part of support of the User Interface – it has no significance in a cutting edge VB.Net condition. There will be little to be picked up from any endeavor to change over the Form related code.
The VBA to VB.Net change exertion ought to focus on the recognizable proof and transformation of business guidelines contained in VBA code modules and the Form's VBA code.
A Summary Of Conversion Effort Required
These are the issues confronting the engineer:
Extend – There is the choice of utilizing a MDI Form or a Multi-Tabbed Form
Menu – A TreeView control would plentifully supplant the old Switchboard or Menu Form
Shapes – The current Forms should be totally revised
Modules – Business rationale code ought to be separated
Reports – The current Microsoft Access reports can at present be utilized
Tables – The current Back-End Microsoft Access Tables can in any case be utilized
Actualizing Visual Basic.Net Standards
The change exertion particularly relies on the coding models utilized by the past Microsoft Access software engineers. Ordinarily, contingent on the experience of the developers and the age when the framework was first made – the benchmarks will leave a considerable measure to be wanted.
Module coding guidelines that will facilitate the change ought to be changed over first. There are a few adjustments that should be possible at first to make the later code transformation simpler:
Reliable space
Announce all Variables with a Type
Utilize a prefix of say "m_" or "g_" for Module or Global factors
Guarantee that Global factors announced are for sure required internationally
Set Option Explicit in each code Module
Add an information Type to all Variables, regardless of whether dimensioned or a parameter
Add an arrival information sort to all Functions
Utilize capacities like DateAdd for date number-crunching, rather than "+" or '- "
Dispense with all Eval capacities
Dispense with all "blast" develops – i.e. Forms!Customers!CustomerID
It would be useful if Control fields could be renamed with expressive names, rather than Text1, Text2 or Command1, Command2. Sadly changing a Field name can cause issues, as the Field might be alluded to in different Forms, Macros, Reports, Modules or Queries. After any such changes, the Access framework normally turns into a bad dream to troubleshoot.
Lastly, utilize an Access code analyser to distinguish significant issue zones.
Changing over DAO To ADO
DAO capacities like Recordsets and Querydefs should be changed over to either ADO or ADO.Net. ADO.Net has supplanted ADO, yet ADO is as yet bolstered. On the off chance that you know about ADO, stay with it – it is less complex than and similarly as productive as ADO.Net.
After The Initial Conversion To Visual Basic.Net
Keeping in mind the end goal to get the new VB.Net framework working effectively and wiping out code notices, the accompanying issues should be gone to:
All factors in Functions or Subroutines will, naturally, be proclaimed with a ByVal watchword. Wherever an esteem should be restored, the watchword ought to be changed to ByRef.
Discretionary parameters in Function and Sub schedules must have a default esteem.
Constants will require an unequivocal information sort.
Utilize Option Strict to guarantee productivity and maintain a strategic distance from information Type blunders.
Comments
Post a Comment